Use Climate Alarmism to Positive Effect

Although many believe the Climate Change narrative, it is clearly a narrative. However, in all fairness, it's advocates are not completely off base. They are advocating for movement away from a finite and unsustainable energy base and even though they are claiming a false urgency, they are still correct in their advocacy.The problem anti-alarmist have is that their justification is not honest and therefore invalid. However, I contend that anti-alarmist remember the adage, never let an emergency go to waste. The climate alarmism argument is the perfect opportunity for rational people to steer future energy policy towards nuclear energy and away from solar and wind.On a positive note, both sides know that moving away from fossil fuels is simply a necessity. We just don't agree on which direction to go. If we go to solar and wind, costs will be ridiculous and performance horrible. If we pursue an ideal nuclear plant, costs will be as low as possible and reliability as high as possible. Even better, the environmental impact will be so much less than for solar and wind electricity. Simply resisting the wind and solar lobby is so much less superior than fighting for electricity that is far superior to even fossil fuel electricity.In stating the concept of pursuing an ideal nuclear plant, it needs to be emphasized that current conventional nuclear plants are a case study in criminal malfeasance by the deep state. In no way should another conventional nuclear plant ever be built. All conventional plants are 1% fuel efficient and pose an existential threat to society. Every single conventional nuclear plant is a huge, radioactive, Achille's heel of the nation. If these are ever bombed by an enemy, they will cause contamination and fatality on a mythical scale.In advocating for future nuclear energy, we need to advocate of 'Ideal' nuclear reactors that consist of little more than a tank of lead salted with fissionable metal powder. This design has absolutely no failure modes and no chance of a catastrophic release of radioactive material. If it is ever bombed, the lead would simple congeal and encapsulate the radioactive material. Just as importantly, these plants can be built for 5 times less and produce power for 10 times less.The anti-climate alarmists need to salute the alarmists for their desire to move away from fossil fuels while countering that the solution is an ideal nuclear plant as opposed to solar and wind. Then they will have a forum to prove that ideal nuclear is both 10 times cheaper and 10 times less environmentally impactive. In the end, the alarmist will get zero CO2 and the anti-alarmists will get energy that is not only not more expensive than fossil electricity, but several times less expensive. In that a billion people can't even afford electricity, how nice would it be to usher in electricity that really is nearly too cheap to meter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Your Electricity Rates Are So High And May Triple

The simple answer to this question is that there is no profit in cheap electricity. The people who run this show aren't interested in cheap or efficient. Rather, they are seriously interested in maintaining or escalating profits from either conventional or more expensive alternatives. 75 years ago, nuclear energy promised electricity too cheap to meter, and it still does to this day. However, if it were allowed to be developed the way it should have been developed, it would destroy trillions in market value of fossil fuel resources owned by the uber wealthy. Accordingly, the powers that be pulled the strings necessary to derail the true potential of nuclear energy. Now, three generations later, the same game is being played where a climate warming narrative is being used to impose three times more expensive 'green' energy. To support this assertion, it is necessary to explain how it is nuclear energy was sabotaged such that the laymen can understand it. If a person we
Read more

White Board Screenplay

1st white board:   Voice and text (V/T) Heading: This proposal seeks to create the greatest infrastructure in history (Drawn on white board  (DOWB) showing person building a pyramid)  for the lowest possible cost ( (IMAGE: a person with his pocket pulled out)  to earn the greatest possible profit (IMAGE: a wheelbarrow of gold, acquire global acclaim (draw person holding a statue and wearing a medal), and   build the greatest engineering enterprise on the planet (person in hard hat with crane behind them. P.S. I want the line drawings of the pyramid builder etc. to be a graphic bullet and to progress (appear on the white board) simultaneously as the statements are spelled out to the right of the image. I want the white board to be a self launching video file as opposed to a PDF that must be read page by page. ************************************************************ 2nd white board: (put this IMAGE: top left http://wboc.images.worldnow.com/images/11102271_G.jp
Read more

Was Nuclear Energy Sabotaged?

The deep state is actively peddling the climate change narrative. But to say they are peddling is to 'misrepresent' the facts. The fact is they are enforcing the climate change narrative. As such, it is appropriate to ask why. The end result of the climate narrative is greatly increased electricity costs, AKA Germany. With this said, I direct the readers attention to the topic of nuclear energy. A conventional nuclear reactor (CNR) can only utilize 1% of the uranium mined to fuel it. Think about that for a second; 1%!!! This begs the question, was nuclear energy sabotaged, perhaps to protect the market value of fossil fuel resources? Who in their right mind would even consider building something so ridiculous, much less build an entire industry around it? It can be shown in simple terms that CNRs are one of, if not, the most dangerous and most expensive reactor design ever conceived and are the only reason the cost of nuclear generated electricity is not 10 times cheaper. C
Read more